gender stats
(I tried to post this yesterday, but managed to post only in my ownjournal -- yay brainfog!! And if this isn't the right place to post about it, let me know. The brian fog lives on)
I've just realised the gender stats ignore "Unspecified" in the breakdown.
It says:
Gender
The gender breakdown of our account holders:
* Female 14258 (85.1%)
* Male 2149 (12.8%)
* Other 349 (2.1%)
* Unspecified 10042
But running the numbers I get this:
* Female 14258 (53.2%)
* Male 2149 (8.0%)
* Other 349 (1.3%)
* Unspecified 10042 (37.5%)
Leaving out unspecified seems like it skews it a lot -- only the people who state they identify as male or female or don't mind being "other"ed are counted -- but the people who don't fit in those categories are 37.5% of the userbase.
I also note that the choice on the profile is "Rather not say", not "Unspecified", and those mean very different things to me.
~Carys
I've just realised the gender stats ignore "Unspecified" in the breakdown.
It says:
Gender
The gender breakdown of our account holders:
* Female 14258 (85.1%)
* Male 2149 (12.8%)
* Other 349 (2.1%)
* Unspecified 10042
But running the numbers I get this:
* Female 14258 (53.2%)
* Male 2149 (8.0%)
* Other 349 (1.3%)
* Unspecified 10042 (37.5%)
Leaving out unspecified seems like it skews it a lot -- only the people who state they identify as male or female or don't mind being "other"ed are counted -- but the people who don't fit in those categories are 37.5% of the userbase.
I also note that the choice on the profile is "Rather not say", not "Unspecified", and those mean very different things to me.
~Carys
no subject
I suspect that we'll keep things working the same, only recording the percentages of people we actually have information about, because it seems like the more intuitive way of doing things to me. I'll ask
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
/me apologises profusely
How the hell did I think it had gender there? Very weird - I would have sworn it was in the creation process!
/me puts down the drink
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
But good grief that makes a lot of OpenID and comm accounts! Maybe from the importation of years of comments?
no subject
It's not that I don't mind being othered, but I'd rather specify that I am in fact Other than pretend it doesn't matter. Visibility - I'm here, I'm queer - *really* queer.