rainbow: (Default)
All the Colours of the Me ([personal profile] rainbow) wrote in [site community profile] dw_docs2009-05-08 12:10 pm

gender stats

(I tried to post this yesterday, but managed to post only in my ownjournal -- yay brainfog!! And if this isn't the right place to post about it, let me know. The brian fog lives on)

I've just realised the gender stats ignore "Unspecified" in the breakdown.

It says:

Gender
The gender breakdown of our account holders:

* Female 14258 (85.1%)
* Male 2149 (12.8%)
* Other 349 (2.1%)
* Unspecified 10042

But running the numbers I get this:

* Female 14258 (53.2%)
* Male 2149 (8.0%)
* Other 349 (1.3%)
* Unspecified 10042 (37.5%)

Leaving out unspecified seems like it skews it a lot -- only the people who state they identify as male or female or don't mind being "other"ed are counted -- but the people who don't fit in those categories are 37.5% of the userbase.

I also note that the choice on the profile is "Rather not say", not "Unspecified", and those mean very different things to me.

~Carys

[personal profile] rho 2009-05-08 07:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah. Go ahead and change the "unspecified" on the stats page to "rather not say" and add a note to the description on the gender field to say that the percentages are only the percentages of the people who have chosen to say.

I suspect that we'll keep things working the same, only recording the percentages of people we actually have information about, because it seems like the more intuitive way of doing things to me. I'll ask [staff profile] denise for an official pronouncement, though.
vampwillow: (Default)

[personal profile] vampwillow 2009-05-08 07:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think they are the same though. "Rather not say" implies there is an answer but not for publication, "unspecified" could as easily mean that there isn't one (community, multiple, etc)

[personal profile] rho 2009-05-08 08:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Right. The problem at the moment is that there are different labels on different pages. When it's collected, it's "rather not say" and then when it's reported back it's "unspecified". We want to change it so it says the same thing in both places.

[personal profile] rho 2009-05-08 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Which only goes to show how useless my intuitions are. :)
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)

[personal profile] azurelunatic 2009-05-09 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
Are things like OpenID included in this, where it can be genuinely Unspecified rather than Rather Not Say?
denise: Image: Me, facing away from camera, on top of the Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (Default)

[staff profile] denise 2009-05-09 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
We'll be splitting all of the stats by account type, so you'll be able to see which type of account fits into which category. (I'm not sure, but I think OpenID accounts can't specify a gender either.)
vampwillow: geek! (geek)

[personal profile] vampwillow 2009-05-08 07:54 pm (UTC)(link)
When registering communities I ensure to not select a gender. Maybe others do too? (Maybe 'not relevant/community' should be an option?)
damned_colonial: Convicts in Sydney, being spoken to by a guard/soldier (Default)

[personal profile] damned_colonial 2009-05-08 07:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Now I have the urge to go and mark all my comms as female ;)
vampwillow: (Default)

[personal profile] vampwillow 2009-05-08 08:04 pm (UTC)(link)
I have the same urge, I just try to stop myself (except on single-gendered-member comms, obviously)
denise: Image: Me, facing away from camera, on top of the Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (Default)

[staff profile] denise 2009-05-08 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Gender is only specifiable for personal accounts. :)
vampwillow: a simple optical illusion (optical)

[personal profile] vampwillow 2009-05-08 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)
/me goes to look

/me apologises profusely

How the hell did I think it had gender there? Very weird - I would have sworn it was in the creation process!

/me puts down the drink
denise: Image: Me, facing away from camera, on top of the Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (Default)

[staff profile] denise 2009-05-09 02:41 am (UTC)(link)
Hee. LJ has it -- it's one of the things that we patched.
sine_nomine: (Default)

[personal profile] sine_nomine 2009-05-10 11:18 am (UTC)(link)
Am I allowed to say here that this is just one of the myriad of things I love about all of y'all, and about Dreamwidth?! That you've taken the time to fix teh stoopid....
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)

[personal profile] azurelunatic 2009-05-09 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
I'm wondering if OpenID, especially including OpenIDs from imported commenters/friends, are being counted in the Unspecified, because that would mean a genuine Unspecified for those who have not ever logged in via OpenID at Dreamwidth and poked at their settings.

[personal profile] axelrod 2009-05-09 08:04 am (UTC)(link)
don't mind being "other"ed are counted

It's not that I don't mind being othered, but I'd rather specify that I am in fact Other than pretend it doesn't matter. Visibility - I'm here, I'm queer - *really* queer.