Look ma! A FAQ!

[rho]

Thanks to the hard work of the FAQ team, the FAQ is now at a stage that's close to "completion". I use the scare quotes deliberately, because it's not anywhere near completion, and there's still a whole lot that needs adding and what have you. What's there at this point is pretty stable though, so I'm saying that we've now reached FAQ 1.0.

If you have time, go take a look at the FAQ and comment here to let me know what you think. We've done our best to make the FAQ clear and easy to read and to navigate, and I'd be especially interested to know how you think we've done with that. I'd like to know what you think we've got right, and I'd also like to hear any constructive criticism you have on things that you think we've got wrong.

This is also the place to comment if you find any typos or factual inaccuracies in the FAQ. We've had at least two pairs of eyes looking over every FAQ to try to cut down on errors, but it's inevitable that some will have slipped in. If you find any, comment here, and we'll get them fixed when we get a chance.

Comments

[ivorygates]

What the alt text would say in this case would be the exact same thing the line of text beside the icons says, since this is the FAQ where the new icons are labeled and defined. Since this is so, should these icons be alt-texted, or should we add a note at the top of the FAQ making this clear?

Thanks.

[zvi]

Either way would work; might want to ask someone who actually uses a screenreader what makes the most sense to them.