Um... I think we shouldn't be trying to herd *three* entry definitions (public entries versus access list entries versus filter-list only entries) and just use one NOT!YOU term for entries that Average Account Holder cannot see if Other Average Account Holder has not given them Access. And based on Stuff In The Wiki, I believe the term generally used there is "Protected", as in "Protected Content".
A journal that cannot be read except by persons to whom the account holder's has given access contains nothing but Protected Content.
An entry in a journal whose entries are otherwise visible to anyone who has subscribed to an account holder's journal, but this entry is only visible to some subset of that group, whether an Access Filter, or the whole of the account holder's Access List, is a Protected Entry.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[site community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/comm_staff.png){kind=small}
no subject
A journal that cannot be read except by persons to whom the account holder's has given access contains nothing but Protected Content.
An entry in a journal whose entries are otherwise visible to anyone who has subscribed to an account holder's journal, but this entry is only visible to some subset of that group, whether an Access Filter, or the whole of the account holder's Access List, is a Protected Entry.
Opinions?
no subject
I like your idea of Protected Entry and Protected Content.
The one I'm looking at now, as an example, currently says:
"This won't allow administrators or members of the community to view your locked or filtered entries."
What I'd prefer to change it to is:
"This won't allow administrators or members of the community to view your protected entries."
Opinions? (Wait, was that an echo?)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject