ivorygates: (Default)
Ivorygates ([personal profile] ivorygates) wrote in [site community profile] dw_docs 2009-04-18 01:11 am (UTC)

Um... I think we shouldn't be trying to herd *three* entry definitions (public entries versus access list entries versus filter-list only entries) and just use one NOT!YOU term for entries that Average Account Holder cannot see if Other Average Account Holder has not given them Access. And based on Stuff In The Wiki, I believe the term generally used there is "Protected", as in "Protected Content".

A journal that cannot be read except by persons to whom the account holder's has given access contains nothing but Protected Content.

An entry in a journal whose entries are otherwise visible to anyone who has subscribed to an account holder's journal, but this entry is only visible to some subset of that group, whether an Access Filter, or the whole of the account holder's Access List, is a Protected Entry.

Opinions?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting